"

中国足球队比赛直播---中国足彩网(yb3548.cn)是亚洲优质游戏品牌,综合各种在线游戏于一站式的大型游戏平台,经营多年一直为大家提供安全稳定的游戏环境,中国足球队比赛直播---中国足彩网值得信赖,期待广大游戏爱好者前来体验,中国足球队比赛直播---中国足彩网将把最好的游戏体验带给大家!

  • <code id="ufonv"><thead id="ufonv"></thead></code>

    <th id="ufonv"><td id="ufonv"></td></th> <code id="ufonv"></code>
  • <legend id="ufonv"><em id="ufonv"><track id="ufonv"></track></em></legend>
    <code id="ufonv"><thead id="ufonv"><bdo id="ufonv"></bdo></thead></code>
    <listing id="ufonv"></listing>
    "

    學術活動

    當前位置: 中国足球队比赛直播---中国足彩网 > 科學研究 > 學術活動 > 正文

    學術報告預告:Quantifying Gender Inequality in Academic Careers

    發布時間: 2018-04-26     作者:董仙慧    點擊次數:

    報告人:美國東北大學 Junming Huang博士

    報告時間:2018年5月21日(星期一)下午14:30-16:30

    報告地點:新主樓G849

    主辦單位:大數據科學與腦機智能高精尖創新中心

    報告題目:Quantifying Gender Inequality in Academic Careers

    報告人簡介:

    Junming Huang is a Postdoctoral Research Associate in Center for Complex Network Research at Northeastern University, and an Assistant Researcher at University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. His research interests lie in science of science and social network analysis. He received his PhD in Computer Science at the Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2014, and Bachelor of Science in Physics at Tsinghua University in 2007.

    報告摘要:

    Gender differences in academia have been well documented for over 50 years: significant imbalances in the number of academics, publications, citations, salary, and funding persist across countries and within all disciplines. An epitome of the gender disparity is the “productivity puzzle” -— on average, men publish more than women -— a robust phenomena grounded in a plethora of possible explanations including differences in family responsibilities, peer-review, perceptions of talent, collaboration, and specialization. Here we adapt a career-oriented perspective on the productivity puzzle and find that the central driving phenomena mirrors the “leaky pipeline” metaphor, in that women abdicate academia more probable than men. This driving phenomena is broken down into two components: A systematic inequality for women to leave academia at a higher rate than men, and a structural inequality that disproportionately more productive women are leaving academia than equivalently productive men. Identifying such a driving force rephrases the conversation about gender inequality around the sustainability of women in academia, and has important consequences for administrative and policy makers.

    中国足球队比赛直播---中国足彩网

  • <code id="ufonv"><thead id="ufonv"></thead></code>

    <th id="ufonv"><td id="ufonv"></td></th> <code id="ufonv"></code>
  • <legend id="ufonv"><em id="ufonv"><track id="ufonv"></track></em></legend>
    <code id="ufonv"><thead id="ufonv"><bdo id="ufonv"></bdo></thead></code>
    <listing id="ufonv"></listing>